A man who spent 13 years in a South Carolina prison for murder is entitled to a new trial because of the prosecutor’s “blatantly improper” remarks during closing arguments, the South Carolina Supreme Court has ruled.
Fortune had testified at trial that he fatally shot the victim in self-defense at a Huddle House parking lot in December 2001. He was convicted in 2006 and sentenced to 37 years in prison.
The prosecutor said in his closing argument that prosecutors have an obligation to prosecute when they think someone is guilty.
He went on to say: “My job is to show the truth. On the other hand, the defense attorneys’ jobs are to manipulate the truth. Their job is to shroud the truth. Their job is [to] confuse jurors. Their job is to do whatever they have to—without regard for the truth—to get a not guilty verdict.”
When the defense lawyer objected, the judge sustained the objection, saying, “I don’t think that their job is to defraud the court or the jury, and to that extent I sustain the objection.”
The defense lawyer had also objected to prior remarks by the prosecutor when he said the prosecutor has to “say what the truth is.”
The prosecutor’s argument violated Fortune’s due process rights, the South Carolina Supreme Court concluded.
Similar comments have been condemned by other courts, according to the state supreme court. “We find they were absolutely inexcusable.”